![]() New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20131 First citation in article Crossref, Google ScholarĪ. N-back working memory paradigm: A meta-analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies. First citation in article Crossref, Google ScholarĮ. The multiple faces of working memory: Storage, processing, supervision, and coordination. First citation in article Crossref, Google Scholar Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 1017–1045. Working memory capacity – facets of a cognitive ability construct. Working memory plasticity in old age: Practice gain, transfer, and maintenance. Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 189–217. The generality of working memory capacity: A latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 615–622. Working memory, attention control, and the N-back task: A question of construct validity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 6829–6833. Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory. Visuospatial imagery is a fruitful strategy for the digit span backward task: A study with near-infrared optical tomography. Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 35–49. Abilities involved in performance on competing tasks. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 19, 343–346. How long does the modality effect persist. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 8, 22–33. Effects of reversing digits forward and digits backward and strategy use on digit span performance. Modality effects in verbal working memory: Differential prefrontal and parietal responses to auditory and visual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 639. On the auditory modality superiority effect in serial recall: Separating input and output factors. First citation in article Crossref, Google ScholarĪ. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 149–210. Backward recall and benchmark effects of working memory. First citation in article Google ScholarĪ. Remembering: A study in experimental and social Psychology, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in article Crossref, Google ScholarĬ. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 8, 47–89. The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417–423. *Hint: you can ` generate a random letter in python `_ or use a random integer to index a letter from a list e.g.A. Turn this digit span task into a letter span task using code. Your entire experiment should now look like this: Exercise ¶Īdd a routine to the start of your experiment and ask participants to type their name and occupation. Let’s allow 5 seconds for recall by setting the duration of this component to 5 seconds. This indicates that participants can edit the content of the textbox. Make sure to have the “Editable” field selected. Add a routine called “recall” and inside this routine add a textBox component. In this experiment, we are going to allow participants to type responses. We load our conditions spreadsheet into the Conditions field of our outerloop, in our inner loop we use the variable seriesLen in the nReps field (note that we do not need to start this field with a “$” because the field already contains one in the name). The inner loop, we will name “stimuli” the outerloop we will name “trials”, this is because our outer loop represents each trial and the inner loop represents the series of digits presented within a trial. OK now we want to wrap two loops around this routine. All we would need is to add a code component, change type to JS and type random = Math.random in the Begin Experiment tab. This might not work online, instead what we could do is use int(random()*10) which is easier to translate into Javascript. Because randint() is actually imported from numpy.random.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |